System disruptions
There are recurring service disruptions on some of the search portals due to high traffic. We are working to resolve the issue, you may temporarily encounter an error message.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Revisiting the construction of the Empire State Building: Have we forgotten something?
Jönköping University, School of Engineering, JTH, Civil Engineering and Lighting Science. Umeå School of Business & Economics, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2495-9676
Umeå School of Business and Economics, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
2018 (English)In: Business Horizons, ISSN 0007-6813, E-ISSN 1873-6068, Vol. 61, no 1, p. 47-57Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

What's past is prologue. Or is it? The construction of the Empire State Building (ESB) was not only the fastest erection of a skyscraper ever, but the construction company that took on the job allegedly began with no equipment or supplies that would be adequate for the job. The project was completed ahead of schedule and under budget; instead of 1. year and 6 months as anticipated, it only took 1. year and 45 days. The costs totaled $24.7 million instead of the estimated $43 million. So, we ask, how was this possible and is there something we could learn? Based on a review of existing literature describing the history and construction of the ESB, we outline strategic, operational, and contextual explanations for what appears to be a truly successful megaproject. We illustrate how, for example, inspiration from Henry Ford's assembly line technique, the uniqueness of the logistics during the construction period, the economic decline of the Depression, and early ideas of concurrent engineering and fast-track construction enabled the success. Our conclusion is that there are lessons to be learned in going back to basics when tackling a megaproject.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2018. Vol. 61, no 1, p. 47-57
Keywords [en]
Empire State Building, Empire State Realty Trust, Megaprojects, Project management
National Category
Business Administration
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-37795DOI: 10.1016/j.bushor.2017.09.004ISI: 000423637100006Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85030849386OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hj-37795DiVA, id: diva2:1153161
Available from: 2017-10-27 Created: 2017-10-27 Last updated: 2025-10-13Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

Fulltext(314 kB)2376 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 314 kBChecksum SHA-512
29c6d5b3bfe1ae81a3c37f3bbcd6700d45aad9436898f2393912414a8758f76c7540a710a4930eef05eb9e2c9db6a458a8ff49f5f5413d4c75ebcb6f0b151f18
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Jacobsson, Mattias
By organisation
JTH, Civil Engineering and Lighting Science
In the same journal
Business Horizons
Business Administration

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 2391 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 716 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf