Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The effect of Digital Tools on Auditors' Professional Scepticism: A Quantitative Study of Professional Scepticism in the Swedish Audit Profession
Jönköping University, Jönköping International Business School, JIBS, Business Administration.
Jönköping University, Jönköping International Business School, JIBS, Business Administration.
2020 (English)Independent thesis Advanced level (degree of Master (One Year)), 20 credits / 30 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to investigate and analyze whether the relationship between structural domains represented by CAATs and judgment represented by professional scepticism is related to auditors’ individual characteristics, trait scepticism.

Methodology: This study is based on a quantitative method in the form of a questionnaire sent to all Swedish authorized auditors. The response rate was 16.8 per cent. The responses were analyzed by Spearman correlation matrix, principal component analysis, multiple linear regression analysis, and hierarchical moderated multiple regression analysis. Moreover, this thesis is based on a positivistic perspective to get a general picture of professional scepticism. A deductive approach, going from theory to empirics, has been implemented.

Findings: The results showed a positive relationship between judgment represented by professional scepticism and structure represented by CAATs, where auditors’ individual characteristics, trait scepticism, have a positive moderating effect on the relationship.

Theoretical perspectives: We apply the profession theory, comfort theory and structure and judgment at Swedish authorized auditors with diverse experience.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2020. , p. 111
Keywords [en]
Professional Scepticism, Structure and Judgment, CAATs, Audit Process
National Category
Business Administration
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-48618ISRN: JU-IHH-FÖA-2-20201061OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hj-48618DiVA, id: diva2:1433524
Subject / course
JIBS, Business Administration
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2020-06-17 Created: 2020-05-31 Last updated: 2025-10-13Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1756 kB)1332 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1756 kBChecksum SHA-512
5c5abd1cae71478da072fe9318fd1fd70a7734f6c68cb223409e1e9fb63f9d0cb32e41566ac8f6084eb28a98f8e57a617d1bc7efdc8c265d9e35101a65ad0a81
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
JIBS, Business Administration
Business Administration

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 1335 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 1581 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf