Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Kinematic and perceptual responses in heavy lifting and pulling: Are there differences between males and females?
School of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science, Curtin University, Perth, Australia.
School of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science, Curtin University, Perth, Australia.
School of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science, Curtin University, Perth, Australia.
School of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science, Curtin University, Perth, Australia.
Show others and affiliations
2021 (English)In: Applied Ergonomics, ISSN 0003-6870, E-ISSN 1872-9126, Vol. 90, article id 103274Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

This study investigated kinematic and perceptual differences between the sexes in a heavy lifting and pulling task. A 20 kg box was lifted from floor to chest height, and a 70 kg mannequin pulled across 20m. The effect of height, mass and average grip strength on kinematics and perceived workload was examined in 42 (19 females, 23 males) healthy individuals. A univariate linear regression analysis found females lifted with greater lumbar extension compared to males (p < 0.001), and adopted more hip (p = 0.006) and knee flexion (p = 0.036) in the pulling task. Females reported a greater perceived workload in both tasks (p < 0.001). After the multivariable analysis, only grip strength remained significant for perceived workload in the lift (p = 0.04), and height for knee flexion in the pull (p = 0.009). This highlights that height and strength are important factors driving kinematics and perceived workload. Clinicians may consider these factors in heavy manual tasks, more so than sex. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2021. Vol. 90, article id 103274
Keywords [en]
Kinematics, Perceived workload, Sex differences
National Category
Medical Modelling and Simulation
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-50709DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2020.103274ISI: 000582799900039PubMedID: 32979817Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85091227854OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hj-50709DiVA, id: diva2:1471410
Available from: 2020-09-29 Created: 2020-09-29 Last updated: 2025-10-13Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Falkmer, Torbjörn

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Falkmer, Torbjörn
By organisation
HHJ. CHILD
In the same journal
Applied Ergonomics
Medical Modelling and Simulation

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 259 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf