Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Betydelsen av tillförlitligt underlag vid identifiering av förluster: En fallstudie om förbättringsarbete från ett underhållsperspektiv
Jönköping University, School of Engineering, JTH, Industrial Product Development, Production and Design.
Jönköping University, School of Engineering, JTH, Industrial Product Development, Production and Design.
2021 (Swedish)Independent thesis Basic level (university diploma), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesisAlternative title
The importance of a reliable basis for identifying losses (English)
Abstract [en]

In order to work with continuous improvements and be competitive on the market, it is important that companies identify where their losses are [1]. A suitable way to identify losses is by using measurements [2] and with today’s information technology, it is easier than ever to collect data [3]. The problem is not that companies do not measure performance at all, they measure too much [4]. The study has been made at a producing company who stated that they do not reach their desired amount of availability in the production. There is no information on what their biggest losses are today and there is a lack of a systematic approach to reduce them. There is either any information on how much time that is used on maintenance activities or the distribution between operator maintenance or specialist maintenance. The study’s questions are following: 

[1]   What can be determined and what conclusions can be drawn from existing data from the company’s industrial system and maintenance system? 

[2]   Can a suggestion on a systemized working method be identified for working with availability losses for the case company? 

Theories about operational reliability, maintenance technology, PDCA and the cornerstone model has been used to answer the study’s questions. Quantitative and qualitative data collections has been used to analyze the results from the company’s industry- and maintenance systems. Qualitative interviews have been made with affected personnel. 

The cause of the company’s losses in the industry system cannot be identified as the data does not reflect the reality. The reason for that is the lack of standardized way of working when availability losses are registered. In the maintenance system, the structure of how cases are registered is lacking and the sectioning between operator maintenance and specialist maintenance is unclear. 

The study’s proposed action is to create conditions for the case company to make their data more reliable and how they can reduce their availability losses. This is done by standardizing the work method in the industrial system, introducing a new structure for how the maintenance system is used and structured working methods between operators and maintenance personnel. The entire study results in a model on how to be able to identify losses and how they systematically can be reduced.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2021.
Keywords [sv]
Underhållsteknik, Förbättringsarbete
National Category
Production Engineering, Human Work Science and Ergonomics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-53924ISRN: JU-JTH-MTA-1-20210276OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hj-53924DiVA, id: diva2:1577009
Subject / course
JTH, Mechanical Engineering
Available from: 2021-07-02 Created: 2021-07-01 Last updated: 2025-10-13Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(2073 kB)265 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 2073 kBChecksum SHA-512
12169015ca23b6176239c297183db3af5a27c642f90d934657c08bfb3b70612eaff2ac818b62c46222f87a9749a7a83b19a68d95d4d258ddb821d1d3c1c98bda
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
JTH, Industrial Product Development, Production and Design
Production Engineering, Human Work Science and Ergonomics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 266 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 595 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf