Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Finns det skillnad i beräkningstänkande mellan länder?: En undersökande studie som jämför Sveriges och Sydafrikas syn på beräkningstänkande i programmering
Jönköping University, School of Engineering.
2023 (Swedish)Independent thesis Advanced level (degree of Master (One Year)), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesisAlternative title
Is there a difference in computational thinking between countries? : An investigative study comparing Sweden and South Africa approach to computational thinking in programming (English)
Abstract [en]

Because it is a fundamental skill to develop in education, computational thinking (CT) has become a growing field in education. The ability to solve algorithmic problems and reuse solutions from one concept to another is the definition of CT(J.Shute et al. p.142). 

In this study, the goal was to investigate the CT knowledge between countries such as Sweden and South Africa. With both countries adopting different ways of teaching CT to their students. Sweden uses the method of implementing programming through the STEM(science, technology, engineering and mathematics) subjects. While South Africa uses a separate subject called Coding and Robotics to teach their students. Using the Computational thinking test(CTt) and Bebras task as the method of choice to conduct the study on 22 students from Sweden and South Africa. By comparing the results from the students there were conclusions that could be drawn on how the differences in teaching had an impact on their gained CT knowledge. As well as if there were different concepts within the CTt where either country excelled over the other.

The tests were conducted online and for the students from South Africa it was also conducted at home during their holiday break and it was concluded that there were no differences between the two countries since there was not enough evidence to support  a median other than 0 at the ∝ = 0.05 significance level. The results indicate that the difference in how CT is implemented in school made no difference for the results as well as the experience in block based and text based programming.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2023. , p. 81
Keywords [en]
Computational Thinking, Programming, High School, Computational Thinking Test, Bebras task
National Category
Educational Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-61281ISRN: JU-JTH-IKA-2-20230292OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hj-61281DiVA, id: diva2:1770215
Subject / course
JTH, Informatics
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2023-06-20 Created: 2023-06-19 Last updated: 2025-10-13Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(8584 kB)180 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 8584 kBChecksum SHA-512
6b9edd8b742632cc17411157439d6f9fd555430381dcf2ee5c88b1f7ede7f9f66fe00e28ea7d42f61e0fb89d1b2f64a98c8cdf5584c97f0bc50d266f6ce6ca03
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Lang, Annie
By organisation
School of Engineering
Educational Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 181 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 167 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf