Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Analysis of Simulation Modeling: A Study of Simulation Modeling Programs in the Context of Manufacturing Processes
Jönköping University, School of Engineering, JTH, Product Development, Production and Design.
2024 (English)Independent thesis Advanced level (degree of Master (Two Years)), 80 credits / 120 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

Abstract 

Purpose: The main goal of this master thesis consists of the study and comparison of simulation modeling programs. Specifically, two different programs will be analyzed. The research also concerns the development of a general decision matrix to guide the selection of simulation programs in the context of manufacturing processes. The emphasis lies on semi-automated manufacturing processes.

Method: The applied methods within the master thesis focus on the usage of a literature review as well as two single case studies. The literature review forms the foundation for the selection of the simulation modeling programs and the definition of the benchmarking criteria. While one case company shows how the study can be implemented in realistic scenarios, the other case is used to underpin the findings from the literature review with opinions from the industrial context. The second one regards the development of the benchmarking criteria. The data is collected through observations, time studies,interviews, and a questionnaire. 

Findings: The findings cover the case study which was chosen as a semi-automated manufacturing process. The example is divided into four distinct workstations whichinclude manual handling, robotic interactions, and a conveyor system as transportation. The selection process for the simulation modeling programs was mainly based on the conducted literature review. Due to the focus on manufacturing processes, the decision was made to the programs Visual Components as well as 3D Experience – DELMIA. The development of the benchmarking criteria was also part of the findings and represents a crucial aspect for the following analysis of the simulation modeling programs. The results were drawn from the literature review as well as the conducted interviews. In total six criteria groups, each with three sub-criteria were defined. The questionnaire allowed the ranking of the importance level for the defined criteria. 

Implications: The research identifies the strengths and limitations of both simulation modeling programs. The analysis was conducted based on the selected criteria groups and sub-criteria which take the perspective of experts from the industry into account. Furthermore, a general decision matrix is part of the outcome. It enables transferabilityfor other companies with the same focus on manufacturing processes. 

Delimitations: The master thesis focuses on the comparison of two simulation modeling programs within the manufacturing context. One semi-automated manufacturing process of the case company builds the foundation for the analysis. However, the thesis will not provide completely developed simulations. The focus lies on a broad comparison and analysis that takes several distinct criteria groups into account. The depth of the analysis and findings is influenced by the timeframe of the master thesis project. 

Keywords: Simulation modeling; 3D Experience – DELMIA; Visual Components; manufacturing processes; decision matrix; criteria

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2024.
Keywords [en]
Simulation modeling; 3D Experience – DELMIA; Visual Components; manufacturing processes; decision matrix; criteria
National Category
Production Engineering, Human Work Science and Ergonomics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-65778OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hj-65778DiVA, id: diva2:1886077
External cooperation
Axelent Solutions
Subject / course
JTH, Production Systems
Presentation
2024-05-27, Jönköping, 20:31 (English)
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2024-07-30 Created: 2024-07-29 Last updated: 2025-10-13Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

Master Thesis - Celina Rösen(5083 kB)810 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 5083 kBChecksum SHA-512
a39e8de5e1979d887b433db9e490f0ae3923f7a0c82b2bf9beaae56fcf4cfd0b7fe01a1cb10f7b076a040ab8a9a4c4d35e98037817f878979911491b7a3ad356
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
JTH, Product Development, Production and Design
Production Engineering, Human Work Science and Ergonomics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 814 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 634 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf