Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
A comparative study of some gradient based and gradient free methods for constructing optimal approximate designs
Jönköping University, Jönköping International Business School, JIBS, Statistics. Jönköping University, Jönköping International Business School, JIBS, Centre for Entrepreneurship and Spatial Economics (CEnSE).ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4295-2574
Department of Statistics, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.
2024 (English)Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

Owing to the widespread application of optimal designs, we are motivated to compare different methods of constructing optimum designs. In this regard, some optimization algorithms are considered to construct approximate optimal designs. Some of these methods are gradient based while some others are gradient free. The studied methods include a class of multiplicative algorithms, simulated annealing and Nelder-Mead with the barrier method. Optimization algorithms are explored through iterations for deterministic methods and simulations for stochastic methods, depending on the approach used. These algorithms are investigated across various models, including the quadratic model, cubic model, quartic model, a practical model in chemistry, and models with two and three design variables. A comprehensive behavioral analysis of optimization algorithms, focusing on iterative and simulative approaches, with key findings from these methods are highlighted. Additionally, the strengths and weaknesses of the methods are analyzed, and a comparison between them is performed. Based on our research, the multiplicative algorithm is the best choice if the gradient is available due to its faster and more accurate performance than Nelder-Mead and simulated annealing and ease of implementation. Gradient-free methods like Nelder-Mead and simulated annealing should be used if finding gradient is difficult or impossible. Although simulated annealing is slower and component-sensitive, it is more accurate. What makes one algorithm better than another depends on the needs of the optimization problem.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2024.
Keywords [en]
Approximate designs, Gradient based algorithms, Gradient free algorithms, Comparison of optimization algorithms, Iteration, Monte-Carlo simulation
National Category
Computational Mathematics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-66498OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hj-66498DiVA, id: diva2:1909306
Conference
6th International Conference on Statistics: Theory and Applications (ICSTA 2024), August 19-21, 2024, Barcelona, Spain
Note

Received BEST PAPER AWARD in 6th International Conference on Statistics: Theory and Applications (ICSTA2024).

Available from: 2024-10-30 Created: 2024-10-30 Last updated: 2025-10-13Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Improving estimation precision through optimal designs and shrinkage methods
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Improving estimation precision through optimal designs and shrinkage methods
2024 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

This thesis book brings together the research findings from four interconnected papers, each contributing to the field of statistical modeling and optimization. The central theme focuses on developing and comparing estimation strategies, optimization algorithms, gamma regression models, and estimation methods for high-dimensional data, showing a coherent progression of ideas and methodologies. The first paper focuses on the comparison of different optimization algorithms in constructing approximate optimal designs. It evaluates both gradient-based and gradient-free methods, including Multiplicative Algorithm, Simulated Annealing, and Nelder-Mead with the barrier method, across different models including, cubic model, quartic model, a practical chemistry model and models with two and three design variables. The study highlights the strengths and weaknesses of these methods through iteration and simulation under various scenarios, providing a comprehensive comparison of their performance. After constructing the optimal design, the focus transitions to strategies for estimating regression coefficients. The second and third papers address this by presenting improved estimation techniques for gamma regression models, which are crucial in areas such as life testing, cancer forecasting, and quality control. These papers introduce novel estimation methods, including Stein-type shrinkage estimators, preliminary test esti- mators, and penalty estimators like LASSO and Ridge Regression. The asymptotic distributional bias and asymptotic quadratic risk of the shrinkage estimators are derived analytically. The papers also explore the performance of the shrinkage estimators when it is suspected that the parameters may be restricted to a subspace of the parameter space. Comprehensive Monte Carlo simulations are conducted to evaluate the proposed estimators, revealing their superiority over traditional maximum likelihood estimators. The effectiveness of the proposed estimators is demonstrated in a real-world appli- cation involving prostate cancer data. The fourth paper extends the exploration to high-dimensional data, addressing the challenge of estimating regression coefficients in data envelopment analysis (DEA). It investigates the efficacy of LASSO, Elastic Net, Adaptive LASSO, and Ridge Regression estimators in the context of DEA. Through extensive simulation studies, the paper assesses these methods in terms of bias and mean squared error under various scenarios, including different levels of correlation among variables and sample sizes. The practical application of these methods is demonstrated using data from the Swedish electricity distribution sector. Collectively, these studies contribute to the advancement of statistical methodologies by offering robust optimization and estimation techniques applicable to a wide range of scientific and practical problems, from optimal design construction to efficiency analysis in high-dimensional settings.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Jönköping: Jönköping University, Jönköping International Business School, 2024. p. 19
Series
JIBS Dissertation Series, ISSN 1403-0470 ; 166
National Category
Probability Theory and Statistics
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-66502 (URN)978-91-7914-046-5 (ISBN)978-91-7914-047-2 (ISBN)
Public defence
2024-10-25, B1014, Jönköping International Business School, Jönköping, 13:15 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2024-10-30 Created: 2024-10-30 Last updated: 2025-10-13Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Authority records

Mahmoudi, Akram

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Mahmoudi, Akram
By organisation
JIBS, StatisticsJIBS, Centre for Entrepreneurship and Spatial Economics (CEnSE)
Computational Mathematics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 212 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf