Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Usability testing AI-supported social service risk assessment system
Department of Culture and Society, Division of Social Work, Linköping University, Sweden.
Jönköping University, School of Engineering, JTH, Department of Computing.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0020-1756
Department of Psychology, Lund University, Sweden.
Department of Psychology, Lund University, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
2025 (English)In: European Journal of Psychology Open, E-ISSN 2673-8627, Vol. 84, no Suppl. 1, p. 212-213Article in journal, Meeting abstract (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

RESEARCH OBJECTIVES: Social service risk assessments in Sweden have been criticized for lacking transparency. The present project aims to alleviate cognitive limitations in these assessments by creating an AI-based support system.

THEORETICAL BACKGROUND: Previous research has shown that human cognition is limited. Custody evaluators are expected to ensure that all components are included and understood, include relevant scientific and experience-based information, and merge all information into transparent risk assessments. A generative AI-system was developed using role-based prompt engineering and ChatGPT 4o. The AI-system contains a support structure and scientific information relevant to social service risk assessments. The AI-system, via chat-bot dialogue, guides the social worker through the aforementioned model and information. Upon completion, the AI-system suggests a preliminary risk assessment based on a mathematical model but leaves the final decision to the user.

METHOD: Iterative design was used to measure usability where two active custody evaluators tested the AI-system, met the developer, and verbally commented on the AI-system. The results are based on the second iteration.

RESULTS: Testers appreciated memory overload amelioration, an objective preliminary risk assessment, and increased transparency, time efficiency, and learning curve. Also, dialogue rigidity and oversimplification in the risk model were stressed. Testers desired support in removing irrelevant information, using the AI system as a litigation deterrent for parents, and adding relevant information.

LIMITATIONS: External validity is limited because of few testers and the system is only in its second iteration.

RESEARCH IMPLICATIONS: The AI-system provided structure and information important for increased transparency in social service risk assessments, and allowed faster learning for inexperienced custody evaluators. Scientific validation of transparency and overall quality is needed.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Hogrefe & Huber Publishers, 2025. Vol. 84, no Suppl. 1, p. 212-213
National Category
Computer and Information Sciences Social Work
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-69507DOI: 10.1024/2673-8627/a000085ISI: 001691096702133OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hj-69507DiVA, id: diva2:1988750
Conference
19th European Congress of Psychology, 1-4 July 2025, Paphos, Cyprus
Available from: 2025-08-13 Created: 2025-08-13 Last updated: 2026-03-19Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records

Holmberg, Linus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Holmberg, Linus
By organisation
JTH, Department of Computing
Computer and Information SciencesSocial Work

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 170 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf