Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Urban-rural integration in China: The role of the rural homestead transfer in different rural areas
China Land Problem Res Ctr, Nanjing 210095, Peoples R China.;Nanjing Agr Univ, Coll Publ Adm, Nanjing 210095, Peoples R China..
Jönköping University, Jönköping International Business School, JIBS, Economics. Jönköping University, Jönköping International Business School, JIBS, Centre for Entrepreneurship and Spatial Economics (CEnSE). KTH Royal Inst Technol, Sch Architecture & Built Environm, Dept Urban Planning & Environm, Stockholm, Sweden..ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2080-6859
2026 (English)In: Habitat International, ISSN 0197-3975, E-ISSN 1873-5428, Vol. 167, article id 103613Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Sustainable development
00. Sustainable Development, 8. Decent work and economic growth
Abstract [en]

Land system reform is a central component of the structural-economic transformation of rural China. The activation of rural land factors is consistent with urban and rural integration, which requires a balance between factors of land, labor and capital.

Method: We develop a theoretical framework of urban-rural factors that incorporates three components: land, labor and capital and estimate the effects of rural homestead transfer (RHT) by comparing three cases of different practices at different rural homestead transfer cases.

Results: In the first case, results suggest that rural labor can only choose emigration due to non-existing local industries. In the second case, the off-site replacement was successful with the optimal allocation and reorganization of land and industries. Nevertheless, the improvement of household living standard and comprehensive rural revitalization was insufficient. In the third case, the reform has achieved local industrialization and urbanization at "low level". The land factor and the labor force were well integrated, resulting in return migration and livelihood diversification forms.

Conclusions: the activation of land factors, return migrations of the rural labor and industrialization are critical factors for rural economic development. The promotion of coordinated development of these factors can positively affect household living standards and rural revitalization. This highlights the importance of place-oriented development strategies for comprehensive rural revitalization through the reform process.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2026. Vol. 167, article id 103613
Keywords [en]
Rural homestead transfer, Land development rights, Industry, Livelihood, Urban-rural integration, Rural vitalization
National Category
Economics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-70160DOI: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2025.103613ISI: 001603887000002Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105020597573Local ID: HOA;intsam;1045834OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hj-70160DiVA, id: diva2:2012969
Available from: 2025-11-11 Created: 2025-11-11 Last updated: 2025-11-14Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Westlund, Hans

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Westlund, Hans
By organisation
JIBS, EconomicsJIBS, Centre for Entrepreneurship and Spatial Economics (CEnSE)
In the same journal
Habitat International
Economics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 76 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf