Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
UTVÄRDERING AV OLIKA BYGGPROJEKTS BRISTER UTIFRÅN GARANTIBESIKTNINGSPROCESSEN
Jönköping University, School of Engineering, JTH, Civil Engineering.
Jönköping University, School of Engineering, JTH, Civil Engineering.
2010 (Swedish)Independent thesis Basic level (degree of Bachelor), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

This thesis is ordered by Peab Sweden AB Regional Jönköping and concerns of warranty inspections.

The intention is to work out a basis, which show the most common complaints is the warranty inspections, and make a small analysis on what causes them to be. The report also presents possible solutions to prevent the occurrence of defects. It also covers the issue of how the client looks at Peabs way to overcome the objections of warranty inspections. The report has the following issues:

•What are the most common errors observed during the warranty inspection?

•What are the causes of complaints?

•What can be done to reduce the number of complaints?

•How the customer thinks that the complaints be addressed?

Twenty-five Guarantee survey records from the projects Peab has done in recent years has been the starting point for the investigation. In the protocols, we have categorized the remarks and made a compilation of common remarks. Through interviews with inspectors, buyers, site managers and Peab's inspection team the results have been analyzed and interpreted.

These survey methods have resulted in various proposals for measures that can reduce the remarks. An example may be to inform professional workers in the building about what the most common remarks are and how to guarantee that these can be prevented.

The compilation is categorized according to the most common complaints, construction types, actors and types of buildings.The compilation of inspection protocols showed that the cracks are the most common complaints. The interviews gave confirmation that the survey compilations of protocols were equivalent to reality.

The conclusion is that the most common complaints are mainly cracks in the wall corners, roof angles and doors that need to be adjusted. These remarks are mainly due to the tight construction times, sloppy and wet materials that are installed. But there are also many other factors contributing to many of the common faults of warranty inspection that cannot be defined as a single cause. Interviews with clients revealed that they are satisfied with the way Peab remedy defects observed at guarantees, while the survey does not disturb the residents/production.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2010. , p. 61
Keywords [sv]
garantibesiktning, garantitid, besiktningsanmärkning, Peab
National Category
Building Technologies
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-13153OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hj-13153DiVA, id: diva2:351995
Uppsok
Technology
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2010-11-02 Created: 2010-09-17 Last updated: 2025-10-13Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(955 kB)1500 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 955 kBChecksum SHA-512
58acf3a10dc259ef59ed130a17bbb3f8cfa99ff25008ee4f6e38e26d4770b4355142c5dac6c3611f772ce8c3175c587783fe51dcf6c40b0bd671d394365f26b2
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
JTH, Civil Engineering
Building Technologies

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 1501 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 842 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf